Holistic Structure Design

Picture of Spencer J. Lund

Spencer J. Lund

CIO

Strategy Overview

• Addresses the intentional design of ownership, entity, tax, and estate structures as a unified system
• Most often applies to complex real estate portfolios with long-term, multigenerational objectives
• Focuses on coordination across investment, tax, legal, and estate planning disciplines
• Primary objective is ensuring all structural decisions reinforce one another rather than operate in isolation

Holistic structure design treats real estate portfolios as living systems, not collections of standalone decisions.

Common Scenarios

Holistic structure design becomes relevant when:

  • Portfolios have evolved organically over many years
  • Multiple strategies have been layered without an overarching framework
  • Tax efficiency, governance, and estate planning are handled separately
  • Investors seek clarity, simplicity, and long-term resilience
  • Future transitions are anticipated but not yet imminent

These scenarios often signal the need for architectural thinking rather than incremental fixes.

The Problem

Many real estate portfolios are optimized locally but inefficient globally.

Individual decisions—entity formation, financing, tax elections, estate planning—are often made in isolation. While each choice may be defensible on its own, the combined result can be structural friction, unintended tax exposure, and misalignment between lifetime objectives and long-term outcomes.

The absence of a cohesive framework makes portfolios harder to manage, harder to transition, and harder to adapt over time.

The Solutions

Holistic structure design emphasizes integration over optimization. Common solutions include:

  • Aligning Entity Structures with Investment Strategy to support growth, transitions, and exits
  • Coordinating Tax Planning Tools such as §1031, §721, and depreciation strategies within a single framework
  • Integrating Trust and Estate Structures directly into ownership design
  • Simplifying Governance and Reporting to reduce operational drag
  • Designing for Optionality so future decisions can be made without structural constraints

The goal is coherence—each structural component should reinforce the others.

Case Study

An investor has accumulated a diverse real estate portfolio through multiple entities, exchanges, and partnerships over decades. While performance is strong, decision-making has become fragmented, and long-term planning lacks clarity.

Through a holistic redesign, ownership entities are consolidated, tax strategies are sequenced intentionally, and estate structures are embedded directly into the ownership framework. The resulting structure is easier to manage, more tax-efficient over time, and prepared for both near-term adjustments and long-term generational transfer.

Tradeoffs and Considerations

Holistic structure design involves important considerations:

  • Upfront Planning Effort – Requires significant coordination and analysis
  • Cross-Disciplinary Alignment – Success depends on collaboration across advisors
  • Change Management – Transitioning from legacy structures requires care
  • Long-Term Commitment – Benefits accrue over time rather than immediately

Despite these challenges, the durability gained often outweighs the complexity.

Takeaways

Holistic structure design replaces reactive decision-making with intentional architecture.

When ownership, tax strategy, governance, and estate planning are designed as an integrated system, real estate portfolios gain resilience, flexibility, and clarity. The most effective structures are not the most complex—they are the most coherent.